danielx a écrit : > (snip) > Sigh. I TOTALLY realize that Python works by politeness and not > enforcement. I think you are misinterpreting why I think this would be > a good idea. My concern is not with control, but with convenience.
Having free access to implementation is convenient IMHO. > My > suggestion was that privates would only be invisible if you use the dot > syntax (ie if you are an external user); they would not be invisible > altogether (they would still be in __dict__ with no name games). How would this work for class attributes ? (implementation methods, implementation descriptors etc...) Also, it would impact lookup perfs, which is already a somewhat weak point in Python. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
