PA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes. But even with the "best" tool and the "best" intents, projects > still fail. In fact, most IT projects are considered failures: > > http://www.economist.com/business/PrinterFriendly.cfm?Story_ID=3423238
The main thesis of the article you quote (although it acknowledges that other think differently) is that better tools (including iterative, NOT waterfall, development; and, agile programming approaches, more generally) are the way to mitigate that horrid track record. Alex -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
