Bruno Desthuilliers wrote: > there's really no reason to > assume it should be a list - any iterable could - and IMHO should - be > accepted... expect of course for strings (royal PITA case, duh).
> 2/ test for pluginVersionsNeeded.__iter__ (an attribute of most > iterables except strings...): strings don't have __iter__ ?!?! I'm never going to get my head round this language 8-( I can understand strings and tuples being iterable, if you take a sufficiently first-class view of things, but why shouldn't everything "that is iterable" support the function that makes iteration work? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
