Tim N. van der Leeuw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have to admit to a stupid mistake, for which I feel quite ashamed - I > got the loop-size wrong in the Python code. So all Python results > posted by me were off by a factor of 10 :-( > I feel quite bad about that!
Well, this makes *my* results quite surprising. I checked it threetimes. I loop 1000000 times in both Python and C++, and Python here is faster. -- blog: http://www.akropolix.net/rik0/blogs | Uccidete i filosofi, site: http://www.akropolix.net/rik0/ | tenetevi riso e forum: http://www.akropolix.net/forum/ | bacchette per voi. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
