Joel Hedlund wrote: > > Hmmm... So. I should build grimly paranoid parsers for external data, use > duck-typed interfaces everywhere on the inside, and simply callously > disregard developers who are disinclined to read documentation? I could do > that. > > > if you're really serious, unit tests is the way to go - they can check > > for much more than just types. > > Yes, I'm very much serious indeed. But I haven't done any unit testing. I'll > have to check into that. Thanks! >
You might try doctests, they can be easier to write and fit into the unit test framework if needed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctest - Paddy. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
