I would like to see more than one source.. Not that the documentation is good or bad it is just that different people may come up with different ways to explain the same thing and that is good in my view. I would like to see the re module and the string module with as many examples as humanly possible to overexplain it for me. (I am currently downloading a hole directory of re module stuff to try to overcome it)
http://www.dexrow.com Leif K-Brooks wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I am a bit disapointed with the current Python online documentation. I > > have read many messages of people complaining about the documentation, > > it's lack of examples and the use of complicated sentences that you > > need to read 10 times before understanding what it means. > > > > That's why I have started a collaborative project to make a user > > contributed Python documentation. The wiki is online here: > > http://www.pythondocs.info > > I agree that Python's docs could use improvement, and I love the idea of > using a Wiki for the purpose. But maybe MediaWiki would be a better > choice of software? Dokuwiki's syntax looks foreign and a little bit > intimidating to me, but Wikipedia has made pretty much everyone familiar > with MediaWiki's syntax. Less syntax to learn lowers the cost of entry, > which should lead to more contributors. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
