Steve Holden wrote: > Given that many people distribute (enough of) the interpreter with > their Python programs I wouldn't like the above to be regarded as a > blanket statement that the Python license doesn't have to be > considered when distributing the interpreter with program source.
In practice, such a blanket statement can be made because the Python Software License is so liberal. However, anyone who is distributing any part of Python should definitely read the license themselves. Tim Delaney -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
