Dennis Lee Bieber schrieb: > On 23 Sep 2006 09:24:09 -0700, "daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > declaimed the following in comp.lang.python: > >> so the implementation rules of python extension module must have been >> changed, for now, I have to wait for the new release of that module and > > No change... For YEARS the rule has been: Changes in the first > decimal place (version m.n.o - if "n" changes, new binaries are needed; > changes in "o" are just bug fixes and don't change the binary interface; > abandon all hope if "m" changes <G>) of a Python version almost ALWAYS > require 3rd party binary extensions to be rebuilt.
You should read the entire thread. He couldn't import the extension module because it ends in .dll; this was a change introduced in Python 2.5: the module must end in .pyd now. That rule had not been there for YEARS. Of course, had he renamed the file, it then would have complained that he's running a 2.4 extension module in 2.5; *that* rule had been there for YEARS. Regards, Martin -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
