In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Max M wrote: > Lawrence is right that the escape method doesn't work the way he expects > it to. > > Rewriting a library module simply because a developer is surprised is a > *very* bad idea.
I'm not surprised. Disappointed, yes. Verging on disgust at some comments in this thread, yes. But "surprised" is what a lot of users of the existing cgi.escape function are going to be when they discover their code isn't doing what they thought it was. > It would break just about every web app out there that > uses the escape module... How will it break them? Give an example. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
