Antoon Pardon wrote: > > I find this a bit oddly worded. Now the "may always reuse" phrase > suggests this is not an obligation and I can certainly understand > that in the case of integers. But when you enumerate examples you > include None and Booleans, creating the suggestion these don't > have to be implemented as singletons either and that there can be > more than one None, True and False object. Now I probably just > misunderstand, but I'm wondering, is there somewhere in the language > reference that specifies these have to be singletons?
Yes. The topic "The standard Type Hierarchy" in the Language reference specifies this exactly. John Roth > > -- > Antoon Pardon -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
