Steve Holden wrote: > Xah Lee wrote: ... > > This project was undertaken as a response to a challenge put forth to > > me with a $100 reward, on 2005-04-12 on comp.lang.python newsgroup. I > > never received the due reward. > > > Your reading skills must be terrible. You never received the reward > because it never became due. I offered you $100 if (I believe) five > regular readers of c.l.py wrote me to say your version was an > improvement on the original documentation. > > So far (it's now been over a year since your publication, IIRC) not one > single person has written to me. So while your version of the docs may > have some merit, it certainly doesn't fulfil the advertised requirements > for the reward. Which therefore isn't due.
This justification sounds rational. Possibly this should be published in a seperate topic, asking people to review the 2 doc's, whilst giving publically(!) their vote. Finally, all this can contribute to better python documentation (and, sorry, python doc's need _really_ a rework). -- http://lazaridis.com -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
