In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, George Sakkis wrote: > Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > >> Fredrik Lundh wrote: >> > you're not the designer... >> >> I don't have to be. Whoever the designer was, they had not properly >> thought through the uses of this function. That's quite obvious already, >> to anybody who works with HTML a lot. So the function is broken and needs >> to be fixed. >> >> If you're worried about changing the semantics of a function that keeps >> the same "cgi.escape" name, then fine. We delete the existing function >> and add a new, properly-designed one. _That_ will be a wake-up call to >> all the users of the existing function to fix their code. > > Wow. Are you always that arrogant for things you know very little > about, or just plain stupid ?
Wow. Express an opinion, and get called names by trolls. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
