George Sakkis wrote: [...] > You're looking at it backwards; there's no particular reason this > should be a method of class A since it can be used for any arbitrary > object with no extra overhead. Now, if you intend to use it only for > instances of A and its subclasses, the only difference would be > syntactic; if you prefer x.list_cmds() from list_cmds(x), go with the > method.
You are right of course. Let's say it's just bad company; the group I am working with are mainly Java developers. k -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
