Antoon Pardon wrote: > On 2006-10-07, John Machin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Steven D'Aprano wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 18:29:34 -0700, John Machin wrote: >>> >>> >>>>MonkeeSage wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Oct 6, 8:02 pm, "MonkeeSage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>it is clearer to you to make the condition explicit ("blah not False"), >>>>> >>>>>"blah not False" -> "blah is False" >>>> >>>>Whichever way your team wants to interpret it, d00d. >>>> >>>>Please consider whether you should be writing "(blah is False) is >>>>True", that would be more explicit. >>> >>>Puh-lease! Get it right! >>> >>>It should be "((blah is False) is True) is True". >> >>Yes, but it stops after one more iteration. "What I tell you three >>times is true" -- the Bellman, "The Hunting of the Snark", by Lewis >>Carroll. > > > Shouldn't it then be: "((blah is False) is False) is False" > No, that would be
"((blah is True) is False) is True" regards Steve -- Steve Holden +44 150 684 7255 +1 800 494 3119 Holden Web LLC/Ltd http://www.holdenweb.com Skype: holdenweb http://holdenweb.blogspot.com Recent Ramblings http://del.icio.us/steve.holden -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list