Hi
It would help if you could describe the purpose you have in mind for doing this. There is a cute way of doing what you want:
===file: a.py===
# module a.py
test = 'first'
class aclass:
def __init__(self, mod, value):
mod.test = value # Is there another way to refer to the module this class sits in?
===end: a.py===
===file: b.py=== # file b.py import a x = a.aclass(a,'monkey') print a.test ===end: b.py===
When you run "b.py", you will see 'monkey' printed. What we have done here is passed the reference to the *module* a to the constructor for aclass, and that constructor modified the module variable "test". This is a way to avoid using 'global', or in other words, the namespaces of things are still clear (for me anyway).
Cya Caleb
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 00:13:05 +0530, Gurpreet Sachdeva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have two classes;
a.py -->
#!/usr/bin/python global test test ='' class a(b): def __init__(self,test): print test print 'Outside: '+test
b.py -->
#!/usr/bin/python import a a.a('Garry')
I want to pass this string (or any object later) to a.py and that too outside the scope of class a. Is that possible??? If yes, how???
Thanks,
Garry
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
