Terry Reedy wrote: > Implementing a namespace as a Python object (ie, dict) is > completely optional and implementation dependent. For CPython, the > local namespace of a function is generally *not* done that way.
Sure, but this is all just theoretical talk anyway, right? I would like to see more control over the name-binding operation, and exposing the namespace as an object sounds like an interesting way to do this. -- --OKB (not okblacke) Brendan Barnwell "Do not follow where the path may lead. Go, instead, where there is no path, and leave a trail." --author unknown -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list