rick wrote: ... > see that the sequence is reversed. Backwards is pure, simple and easy. > This is not so in Python and it should be.
foo[::-1] isn't "pure, simple and easy"? It derives cleanly from the slice notation, it does exactly what you want, and it even works with lists and tuples and any other class written to support slice notation. Does ruby have a built in string function to do this: foo[::-2]? How about this: foo[-1::-2] or this: foo[-2::-2]? See, it's not about "blindly memorizing this stuff", it's about clever abstractions that allow you to quickly, flexibly and powerfully program your computer. I'd rather learn a few well thought out abstractions than memorize a set of methods. The answer to your OP question, "Why can't Python have a reverse() function/method like Ruby?" is "It can." You can build it yourself quickly and easily, and a lot of other functions as well. Peace, ~Simon -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
