Steve Holden wrote: > Wouldn't that be > > with f() as x, g() as y: > blah(x, y)
or
with f(), g() as x, y:
pass
see guido's comment at the bottom of this page:
http://effbot.org/pyref/with.htm
</F>
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
