John Salerno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But I do like Steve's suggestion that it's better to be explicit > about each attribute, instead of just accepting a list of numbers > (but I can't help but feel that for some reason this is better, > because it's more general).
If you pass a *mapping* of the "I-might-want-to-add-more-in-the-future" values, then you get both explicit *and* expandable, without an arbitrary unneeded sequence. -- \ "He may look like an idiot and talk like an idiot but don't let | `\ that fool you. He really is an idiot." -- Groucho Marx | _o__) | Ben Finney -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
