I heartily agree. pdf format has never been much of a problem for me. Now that you have an ISSN, has it been submitted to Google Scholar or other academic indexes?
http://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/about.html for Google Scholar http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/submitDocument.html for Citeseer These are two I can think of but there must be more. Any suggestions? I think that this is great work guys - I'll see if I can take some time to submit some of the code I developed a few years ago. All the best! Alan Łukasz Langa wrote: > Fredrik Lundh: > > Tennessee Leeuwenburg wrote: > > > > > >> If anyone has any good ideas for how to cope as a publisher with these > >> difficulties, I'm all ears. > >> > > > > has any of the format zealots posting to this thread actually > > volunteered to produce any material for your publication? if not, I > > suggest ignoring them. any bozo with a keyboard can contribute stop > > energy to a project, but at the end, it's always the people *doing* > > things that matters. > > > > </F> > > +1 > > The Python Papers look very, very promising! I'm looking forward to > reading next editions. Don't let whiners slow you down. PDF is a good > choice, I personally like to print out longer things I read. IANAL, so I > won't speak for or against CC licenses. They're used widely nowadays for > a variety of applications (music, art, software, publications) so it > seems they're doing their job. > > Keep up the good work! > > Best regards, > Łukasz Langa -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list