Harry George wrote: > When I came from Perl, I too missed perl-isms and specifically CGI.pm, so > wrote my own: > http://www.seanet.com/~hgg9140/comp/index.html > http://www.seanet.com/~hgg9140/comp/pyperlish/doc/manual.html > http://www.seanet.com/~hgg9140/comp/cgipm/doc/index.html > > Others on this newsgroup said I'd be better off just doing it in raw > python. After a while, I realized that was true. You do > triple-quoted templates with normal python idioms. Throw in > some persistence mechanisms to deal with maintaining state across > transactions, and you are in business. > > Since then I've looked at Zope, Plone, TurboGears, Django, and (for > standalone apps) Dabo. TurboGears is mostly a set of recommendations > on what 3rd party packages to use, with a wee bit of glueware. So far > nothing feels as simple as just doing it in python.
Thats the fragmented journey, almost any web programmer has to go when coming to python. A clear standard, even a clear intro, for simple tasks, like doing state mng, db, error handling, etc. is not there on an easy path. For a level above cgi, what do you think about cherrypy ? http://docs.cherrypy.org/ Robert -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
