Peter Otten wrote: > No, 'k in d' is equivalent to 'd.has_key(k)', only with less > (constant) overhead for the function call.
Ah, thx. Thought the "x in d" syntax might search in d.values() too. Regards, Björn -- BOFH excuse #12: dry joints on cable plug -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
