sam wrote: > hi all, > ... > has anyone else bumped up against this problem before? i suppose > for-loops with 250 million iterations are seldom used in most > applications. it was just the first time i'd ever solved a problem by > actually having some insight into how python works at a slightly lower > level.
Sam, The problem is not with the 'for' operator, but the fact that the range() operator creates the iterable list (in this case, with 250 million elements) prior to beginning the loop. Try using xrange() with the same syntax, which returns items from a tuple (NOT a list, if it matters to you) just-in-time and discards them, much like FOR as used in a BASIC context. xrange() is somewhat less flexible, though, and may or may not suit your needs. If not, use 'while' instead, and set your own loop exit conditions. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
