Hello snakes :)
In [38]: f = [lambda:i for i in range(10)]
In [39]: ff = map(lambda i: lambda : i, range(10))
In [40]: f[0]()
Out[40]: 9
In [41]: f[1]()
Out[41]: 9
In [42]: ff[0]()
Out[42]: 0
In [43]: ff[1]()
Out[43]: 1
I don't understand why in the first case f[for all i in 0..9]==9
what is different from (more usefull)
In [44]: f = ["%i" % i for i in range(10)]
In [45]: f
Out[45]: ['0', '1', '2', '3', '4', '5', '6', '7', '8', '9']
doing it like this works again
In [54]: def d(x):
....: return lambda:x
....:
In [55]: f = [d(i) for i in range(10)]
In [56]: f[0]()
Out[56]: 0
In [57]: f[1]()
Out[57]: 1
in a C programmer sence I would say there seems to be no "sequence
point" which would separate "now" from "next"
Regards, Daniel
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
