Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Well, .jpg files are already compressed in a lossy way (.jpg is > inherently lossy); to compress it further, you need to increase > the loss.
or use a better algorithm, such as JPEG 2000 or Microsoft's HD Photo, which both give better visual quality at lower bit rates (which means that you can often get by with around half the bits compared to JPEG). </F> -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
