Steven Bethard wrote:
> How are you doing it currently? Here's a sort of minimalist option:
>
> >>> class weeble(object):
> ... def __metaclass__(name, bases, bodydict):
> ... cls = type(name, bases, bodydict)
> ... cls.wumpus = 'brinjal', cls
> ... return cls
> ...
> >>> weeble.wumpus
> ('brinjal', <class '__main__.weeble'>)
>
> Of course, it still takes four lines and a metaclass...
Well, 'type' is a metaclass, yes, but not a custom metaclass, so I
would say that you are
using the metaclass hook here, but not a "real" metaclass. Still
waiting for class decorators ...
Michele Simionato
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
