Zut ! I'm very sorry that there is no good use case for the "reduce" function in Python, like Peter Otten pretends. That's an otherwise very useful tool for many use cases. At least on paper.
Python documentation should say "There is no good use case for the reduce function in Python and we don't know why we bother you offering it." Francis Girard Le lundi 7 Février 2005 08:24, Peter Otten a écrit : > Francis Girard wrote: > > This is a prefect use case for the good old "reduce" function: > > > > --BEGIN SNAP > > > > a_lst = [None,0,0,1,1,1,2,2,3,3,3,2,2,2,4,4,4,5] > > > > def straightforward_collapse(lst): > > return reduce(lambda v,e: v[-1]!=e and v+[e] or v, lst[1:], [lst[0]]) > > reduce() magically increases the number of function calls by len(a_list). > There will be no good use cases for reduce() until Python can inline > functions. > > Apodictically Yours > Peter -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
