In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jan Theodore Galkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I think Python is very fine although, arguably, because many are >approaching it from a Java strong-typing static mindset, I bet the space >of design possibilities hasn't been explored thoroughly. We've not had >an excellent dynamic OO language since Smalltalk, IMO. Perhaps Ruby is >or is not. But I've looked a bit at Ruby, and I like Python more.
Guido was opposed to modifying builtin types before Java existed. It's similar to his opposition to dynamic syntax. -- Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "I support family values -- Addams family values" --www.nancybuttons.com -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
