On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 20:56:44 -0800, Courageous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Follow the copyright holder's wishes. > > That's fair. After all, it's free, so they're doing you a damn > big favor.
I'm terrible sorry to extend this topic even furter, but it's silly, not to say dull to think like that. in the first place, it's not that they're doing charity. they have plans. if they release Qt under GPL for non-comercial use, it's because they want to increase the user base and so be able to earn money with the comercial fee later. And if i'm going to write software for it, when there's plenty of alternative that actualy works flawless under windows, why should i stick with an option that i don't even know to wich extends i can use the damn thing? What it they revoke this license? what it windows longhorn has a non-backwardcompatible GDI API and a newer version of Qt must be used, and that newer version does not have a gpl version? If i'm going to commit to something, i like to know the lengths the other side gona commit also. What you said was like "Hey! it's free food! who cares if it's rotten?" sorry, but it's just too homer simpson for me. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list