On 25/01/07, Bruno Desthuilliers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter Otten a écrit : > > Bruno Desthuilliers wrote: > > > >> and simplified again thanks to Python 'in' operator: > >> while not usrinp.lower() in "yn": > > > > But note that 'in' performs a substring search and therefore "yn" and "" > > would be accepted as valid answers, too. > > Mmm, right. Thanks for the correction. > > => > while not usrinp.lower() in ['y', 'n']:
or better still while usrinp.lower() not in ['y', 'n']: :):) -- Tim Williams -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
