Edward K Ream wrote: >> There is also the 2to3 converter. The aim is that this will be > effective enough that coders should be able to maintain a 2.X (2.6 ?) > codebase, run it through 2to3 and have the result run unchanged on > Python 3. That way there will be no need to maintain two code bases. > > I have offered a proof that the converter must change print to print2 (or > some other name) in order to maintain a common code base. How much > clearer > can I be? If a common code base is desired, it *is* the end of print
There could be something like from __future__ import print_function to remove the print keyword in 2.x. Peter -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
