[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thx > but is there any simpleir way, if using not class, but just struct (or > something like that, MATLAB equivalent for that one)? > I'm thinking of rewriting some optimization solvers (non-smooth, > constrained, with (sub)gradients or patterns provided by user) to > Python and I don't know currently is it possible to easy convert > things like > prob = []; > prob.advanced.ralg.hs = 1 (so in this line all subfields are > generating automatically in MATLAB or Octave) > I have huge amount of such lines, and implementing separate class for > each one is unreal.
Get used to thinking of a class as a lightweight construct written with well-defined constraints rather than some know-it-all can-do-everything unwieldy monster. You can of course use one class throughout >>> class Struct: ... def __init__(self, **kw): ... self.__dict__.update(kw) ... >>> a = Struct(f=42) >>> b = Struct(x=1, y=2) >>> a.f 42 >>> b.x, b.y (1, 2) but separate classes don't require much more effort and make your code both more readable and more flexible. Peter -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
