En Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:25:56 -0300, Fuzzyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On Feb 19, 5:11 am, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> En Sun, 18 Feb 2007 20:56:48 -0300, Fuzzyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> escribió: >> > [somebody] wrote: >> >> >>> > def getCodeName(deap=0): >> >> >>> > return sys._getframe(deap+1).f_code.co_name >> >> >> This might be useful to avoid metaclass hacks when trying to >> initialize >> >> a class attribute that would require the class name. (my 2 cents) >> >> > It's still an ugly hack. :-) >> > (But a nice implementation detail to know about none-the-less.) >> >> Having class decorators would be nice... > > Yes - and Guido said he wouldn't be opposed to the idea when it was > poitned out that they would be very useful for both IronPython and > Jython to implement features of their underlying platforms. > > I haven't heard anyone (other than you) mention them recently > though... Maybe it's a sign that actually nobody cares about class decorators :( -- Gabriel Genellina -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
