[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Steven Bethard: >> take a look at the current state of tuples: >> 1, 2 >> 1, >> () > > That's not a good situation. I presume the situation/syntax of tuples > in Python 2.x can't be improved. But can it be improved for Py 3.0?
I'm not really losing any sleep over the current tuple syntax. ;-) The empty tuple is so uncommon in my code that the fact that it's spelled differently just doesn't bother me. And anyway, if I've learned anything from the Python community over the years, it's that syntax is best left to Guido. ;-) STeVe -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
