On 21 Lut, 21:27, "Paul McGuire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Other candidates besides > PLY:http://www.nedbatchelder.com/text/python-parsers.htmlhttp://wiki.python.org/moin/LanguageParsing > > I'm not sure this is a "one size fits all" problem space. > > Personally I find PLY's use of docstrings for grammar definition a bit > too clever (as I'm sure others have their own personal likes and > dislikes on any of these packages, even (gasp) pyparsing). >
I tried some other packages too. PLY was the most suitable for me, but there are many much more powerful tools. If there will be any other parsing tool in standard library that's OK. But I think that python needs some standard parsing tool. -- Jakub Stolarski -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
