> But note that you return the last item of the range too, and that goes > against the semantic of the usual Python range/xrange, so you may want > to call this function with another name.
That makes sense. 100% agree with you. > Maybe there are better ways to solve this problem. Maybe a way to > generate (closed?) char ranges can be added to the Python standard > lib. Maybe we don't want char range If string constants would be rich enough. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list