> But note that you return the last item of the range too, and that goes
> against the semantic of the usual Python range/xrange, so you may want
> to call this function with another name.

That makes sense. 100% agree with you.

> Maybe there are better ways to solve this problem. Maybe a way to
> generate (closed?) char ranges can be added to the Python standard
> lib.

Maybe we don't want char range If string constants would be rich enough.
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to