[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Of course I'll still argue that the WIP character would be a more > elegant, speedy and versatile alternative.
I don't think so. Those characters have no syntactical meaning and would, IMHO, make the language "dirty". Regards, Björn -- BOFH excuse #73: Daemons did it -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
