On Mar 9, 11:57 am, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > En Fri, 09 Mar 2007 07:30:20 -0300, Gerard Flanagan > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > > >> There is a serious flaw on this approach, the function can't return any > >> false value (it would be treated as a failure). > > > I was teaching myself decorators more than anything, so it's not > > thought out to any extent, but even so I don't think it's a "serious > > flaw", rather it would be programmer error to use @onfailFalse on a > > function that may return False. Don't you think? > > I thought this was on response to the original problem, not for your own > problem. >
Mea culpa. Gerard -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
