En Fri, 09 Mar 2007 08:22:46 -0300, Erwan Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Thanks for your answer ... I followed the link > and tried to use the "fully functional implementation of > the super() built-in class in pure Python" given > on this page and the result is quite surprising : It appears that there is some disagreement on how the super object should behave. If you want to know what it actually *does* now (not what it *should* do) you can look at typeobject.c, but it's a bit hard to read, and I don't understand it in full... Maybe looking at the test suite is easier, in test_descr.py -- Gabriel Genellina -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
