On Mar 14, 10:57 am, Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Laurent Pointal wrote:
>
> > Steve Holden a écrit :
> >> Regular expressions aren't really needed here. Untested code follows:
>
> >> for line in open('/proc/meminfo').readlines:
> > for line in open('/proc/meminfo').readlines():
>
> for line in open('/proc/meminfo'):
Yeah, that's nicer.
> Of course it's cleaner to assign the file object to a name and close the
> file explicitly after the loop.
For certain definitions of "cleaner" (insert old argument about how
ref-counting semantics or at least immediate gc of locally scoped
variables when leaving scope _should be_ (not _are_) language-
guaranteed because it makes for cleaner, more programmer-friendly code
and often avoids ugly hacks like assigning a spurious name and/or
using "with" constructs).
But if you're going to do that, "with" is the better option IMO:
from __future__ import with_statement
...
with open('/proc/meminfo') as infile:
for line in infile:
Of course, that alternative requires Python 2.5
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
