Re: a sequence question

[Nick Coghlan]

David Isaac wrote:
"Nick Coghlan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A bug report on Sourceforge would help in getting the problem fixed for
the 2.5
docs

Done.
Bug 1121416, for anyone else interested. Looks Raymond agrees with me about the 
left-to-right evaluation of iterables being an overspecification.

Anyway, that means the zip and izip based solutions are technically version and 
implementation specific. Fortunately, the final versions are fairly easy to turn 
into a custom generator that doesn't rely on izip:

from itertools import islice, chain, repeat
def partition(iterable, part_len):
    itr = iter(iterable)
    while 1:
        item = tuple(islice(itr, part_len))
        if len(item) < part_len:
            raise StopIteration
        yield item
def padded_partition(iterable, part_len, pad_val=None):
    padding = repeat(pad_val, part_len-1)
    itr = chain(iter(iterable), padding)
    return partition(itr, part_len)
Py> list(partition(range(10), 3))
[(0, 1, 2), (3, 4, 5), (6, 7, 8)]
Py> list(padded_partition(range(10), 3))
[(0, 1, 2), (3, 4, 5), (6, 7, 8), (9, None, None)]
Py> list(padded_partition(range(10), 3, True))
[(0, 1, 2), (3, 4, 5), (6, 7, 8), (9, True, True)]
Well spotted on the fact that the way we were using zip/izip was undocumented, 
btw :)

Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan   |   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
            http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list