On Mar 19, 4:09 am, Bruno Desthuilliers <bruno. [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dustan a écrit : > > >http://dustangroups.googlepages.com/privateattributesinpython > > > This is something that I just threw together this morning, after a > > eureka moment. It's a way of creating private class attributes > > What for ? We already have one: prefix 'private' names with a single > underscore. > > > and > > static function variables (I'm not 100% sure if that's the correct > > terminology, but you get what I mean). > > def somefunc(param, _statics={}): > # code here > > > I haven't tried to create > > private instance attributes, mainly because it would just be too > > difficult, > > Same recipe as above : single leading underscore. > > > and it would be awful syntax. I'm not considering actually > > using this, but I do have a couple questions about it. > > > 1. Has anyone else ever come up with something like this? I can't > > imagine I'm the only person who's ever thought of this. > > With something like trying to forcefit access restriction in Python ? > Nope, you're not the first one here. I've not seen anyone using such a > thing in any of the projects I've worked on/with yet.
You ignored certain parts of my post, like "I'm not considering actually using this, but I do have a couple questions about it"; I assume that means you're not even going to begin to attempt to answer my queries. Likewise, you ignored a similar message on the page I linked to. I already knew about everything you told me. With all this active ignoring, I get the feeling you're not even trying to respond to my questions. So why respond in the first place? Were you trying to be hostile? Because I can't see any other intent for your post. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
