> Anyway, the only real point is that if there is a concern about the > copyright and licensing of the output of ShedSkin, then we merely need > to ask the author of it to clarify matters and move on with life. With > the exception of GNAT, to date no GPL'd compiler has ever placed a GPL > restriction on its output. Whether this is explicit or implicit doesn't > matter, so long as it's there.
it's fine if people want to create non-GPL software with Shed Skin. it is at least my intention to only have the compiler proper be GPL (LICENSE states that the run-time libraries are BSD..) mark dufour (Shed Skin author). -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list