"Ziga Seilnacht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | This looks like a bug in Python. It works for all the other | operators: | | >>> class MyInt(int): | ... __sub__ = int.__add__ | ... __mul__ = int.__add__ | ... __div__ = int.__add__ | ... __truediv__ = int.__add__ | ... __floordiv__ = int.__add__ | ... __mod__ = int.__add__ | ... __lshift__ = int.__add__ | ... __rshift__ = int.__add__ | ... __and__ = int.__add__ | ... __xor__ = int.__add__ | ... __or__ = int.__add__ | ... __pow__ = int.__add__ | ... | >>> i = MyInt(42) | >>> i + 3 | 45 | >>> i - 3 | 45 | >>> i * 3 | 45 | >>> i / 3 | 45 | >>> i // 3 | 45 | >>> i % 3 | 45 | >>> i << 3 | 45 | >>> i >> 3 | 45 | >>> i & 3 | 45 | >>> i ^ 3 | 45 | >>> i | 3 | 45 | >>> i ** 3 | 74088 | | You should submit a bug report to the bug tracker: | | http://sourceforge.net/bugs/?group_id=5470
Nice test. I thought maybe __pow__ might be different in not having a reverse form, but indeed, int has an __rpow__ method. Before submitting, make sure that this does not work in 2.5, and then say so in the bug report. In fact, copy the version/system info that the interactive interpreter puts up when it starts. tjr -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
