Carl K a écrit : > Is there a more elegant way of coding this: > > x=o.p # save .p > o.p=0 > o.m() > o.p=x # restore .p > > seems very push/pop to me - like there should be a way that doesn't need > a var (x) or the save/set lines should be done in one command. > > (personally I think .m would better be implemented by passing in a > parameter, but that isn't my choice.)
I was about to comment on this. It looks like o.m is wanting to take an optional arg defaulting to o.p, and you should probably propose a patch to the author. My 2 cents -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
