Paul Boddie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Now I hear that the word "with" is being discussed for a different > > purpose in Py 3 as a result of a PEP and I don't want to conflict with > > that. > > The "with" keyword appears in 2.5 onwards.
...but needs a "from __future__ import with_statement" in 2.5 itself. Alex -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
