Luis M. González wrote: > > Indeed, the subject is absolutely on-topic. > If can't talk about a so called "Dynamic Languages Runtime" in a > pyhton mailing list, I wonder what it takes to be considered on-topic. > Frankly, this on-topic/off-topic fascism I see in this list is pissing > me off a little bit.
It's less on-topic for comp.lang.lisp, though, unless you want to perform in a measuring competition with the Lisp crowd whilst hearing how they did the very same thing as <insert technology here> way back in the 1950s. Despite the permissive licences - it'd be hard to slap a bad EULA on IronPython now - the whole thing demonstrates Microsoft's disdain for open standards as usual, but it remains on-topic for comp.lang.python, I guess. Paul
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
