On May 6, 8:55 pm, gene tani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On May 6, 6:26 am, "Martin P. Hellwig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Dustan wrote: > > > On May 6, 8:20 am, Steven D'Aprano > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> On Sun, 06 May 2007 04:53:23 -0700, Dustan wrote: > > >>> SPAM! > > >>> SPAM! > > >>> SPAM! > > >>> SPAM! > > >>> SPAM! > > >>> SPAM! > > >>> SPAM! > > >>> SPAM! > > >> Gosh, you think so? I'm glad we had you around to tell us, otherwise we > > >> might have thought it was about Python programming. > > > >> Actually, many of us wouldn't even have seen it in the first place, > > >> because our ISPs do a good job of filtering out obvious spam before we > > >> even see it. And then people like you come along, and reply to it, and we > > >> see the reply -- complete with the original spam. > > > > Well, sorry. I didn't realize I'd get whacked around for making a > > > joke. > > > >> -- > > >> Steven. > > > Aren't jokes supposed to be funny? > > <Sorry can't resist/> > > > -- > > mph > > >http://martinphellwig.blogspot.com/ > > What you can do: > > complain to Google adsense about the site's "advertising" > complain to Google groups about the post > > it would be #complete unethical# for me to suggest that OP posted an > apparently unrelated topic because he wanted the site's performance > "ab" tested, like, y'know > > ab -n 100000 -kc 200http://yourspamsitehere.com
No way :( I did many times, ... RE: Google is not moderator bla, bla, shits... -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
