alf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > two ways of achieving the same effect > > > l+=[n] > > or > > l.append(n) > > > so which is more pythonic/faster?
.append - easy to measure, too: brain:~ alex$ python -mtimeit 'L=range(3); n=23' 'x=L[:]; x.append(n)' 1000000 loops, best of 3: 1.31 usec per loop brain:~ alex$ python -mtimeit 'L=range(3); n=23' 'x=L[:]; x+=[n]' 1000000 loops, best of 3: 1.52 usec per loop Alex -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
