Steve Holden wrote: > Beliavsky wrote: >> On May 16, 2:45 pm, "Cameron Laird" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> QOTW: "Sometimes you just have to take the path of least distaste". - Grant >>> Edwards >>> >>> "I want to choose my words carefully here, so I'm not misunderstood. >> <rest snipped> >> >> I think Cameron Laird does a good job with the Python digest but >> blundered here. Why did he highlight a foul comment having nothing to >> do with Python? >> > In fact it *is* peripherally related, since Gartner are currently doing > a "survey" on dynamic languages, and there was a considerable effort > exerted just to make sure that most of the questions actually allowed > sensible comparisons between the various languages. > Please accept my apology: it's Forrester who are currently undertaking the study on dynamic languages. Anyone interested in helping might look at
http://python-advocacy.blogspot.com/2007/05/need-help-in-preparing-for-study-of.html and (now the study is underway) http://python-advocacy.blogspot.com/2007/05/seeking-four-code-samples-for-forrester.html regards Steve -- Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119 Holden Web LLC/Ltd http://www.holdenweb.com Skype: holdenweb http://del.icio.us/steve.holden ------------------ Asciimercial --------------------- Get on the web: Blog, lens and tag your way to fame!! holdenweb.blogspot.com squidoo.com/pythonology tagged items: del.icio.us/steve.holden/python All these services currently offer free registration! -------------- Thank You for Reading ---------------- -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
